CODA
We’ll See You in the Interwebs
This likely won’t come as a shock to anyone, given the dearth of activity on the site in recent times, but we’re going to put this project on an extended/permanent hiatus. We’ll still keep the articles (over a thousand, remarkably!) in our archive and the site will stay online and accessible. Indeed,
the themes and topics we’ve covered here are eternally relevant — and we’ve said quite a lot on them.
Our most sincere thanks go to you, the readers, for supporting this journey since 2010 and helping to make this project a meaningful experience for all concerned. When we started this, the blogosphere was still somewhat sparsely populated, especially from the progressive side of things. Today, with the proliferation of media and movements alike, there are fortunately many options.
The incredible contributors to this space will continue to do their critical work in the world through many platforms, so look for them out there in the web/world. And please, whatever else ensues, do not abandon the essential spark of hope and possibility that has animated this site over the years. The world will keep turning, we’ll keep growing, and there’s always a place for a new clear vision…
PEACE
“American officials had predicted that the missile strike would result in a major shift in Assad’s calculus, but the U.S. attack appeared to be symbolic in reality. Within 24 hours of the strike, monitoring groups reported that warplanes were again taking off from the bombed Shayrat air base, this time to attack Islamic State positions.â€
the stage when our country was wracked with economic apartheid, spawn of greed. His response was cautiously pragmatic. He assumed that the nation would come to its middle class senses once the immediate crisis had passed. For maintaining his faith in capitalism and American exceptionalism he was jeered by the right as dictatorial and cowardly, by the left as fatally compromised.
Dwight Eisenhower gave the world some extraordinary rhetoric — indeed, his words have the sting of ironic shrapnel, considering how little they have influenced the direction of the country and the world in the last six decades.
implications not only in terms of policies and principles, but also for the cultural messages it sends about acceptable behaviors and ideologies. And it’s not about political parties — assuming that construct can be pluralized anymore, with the power of the corporate purse strings tethered to those equivalently across the aisle.

