New Clear Vision


constructive commentary for the chronically farsighted


Breaking the Climate Silence

March 23, 2011 By: NCVeditor Category: Community, Ecology, Priscilla Stuckey

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

‘Heartstorming’ as an Antidote to Denial

by Priscilla Stuckey

We know it’s getting worse; we’re not climate deniers. We’re well informed and aware of the facts. And yet we go about our lives as if nothing has changed. We live the same way we lived five years ago, before the wealth of new climate science confirming that the situation is worse than first thought. Maybe we travel even more than before or live in a bigger house than we did then. (Guilty on both counts.) What’s wrong with us?

We’re obeying the hush-hush rule on climate change. When the President can’t even utter the word climate in his State of the Union speech, at a time when climate change presents emergency levels of economic, health, and national security risks — and that’s just in this country, never mind the millions of people in other parts of the world whose homes and lives are already lost and endangered — you know something is seriously wrong. Even Stewart and Colbert seldom devote time to it.

Climate change — the elephant in the room. The one thing we don’t talk about — not to one another, and especially not to our children. But not talking about climate change is not helping. In fact, it’s costing us. A lot. While Europe plans to boost its economy through tougher greenhouse gas emissions standards and China invests billions in renewable energy, we in the United States basically sit on our hands. And, worse, we clap our hands over our own and one another’s mouths. Climate change? Don’t go there.

Climate silence is a form of denial. Perhaps we are overwhelmed by the enormity of the problem and the grave consequences that loom if we continue as we are. But climate silence is costing us not just dollars and cents but also collective will and energy. This nation is in an emotional as well as economic recession, suffering from sapped energy and collective inertia. As psychologists — and business leaders — have long known, denial is a huge energy sink. Through our silence about the climate, we are hamstringing ourselves, preventing the release of energy, will, resources, and innovation that might actually get us out of this pickle before it’s too late.

A friend of mine, Annette, recently heard poet Gary Snyder speak. During Q and A, someone asked Snyder how people can be inspired to “save the planet.” Snyder thought for a few moments then said, “The planet doesn’t need us to save it. The planet needs us to save ourselves. If we learned how to be better people, we would be doing good work.” The roomful of activists sat in stunned silence, trying to absorb his words. He went on (as Annette wrote), “The planet, if we notice, takes care of itself. Watch a place for a while. Look to the seasons, the weather, the animals, our own inner rhythms. Walk trails and notice things. We don’t have to do a thing.”

In the spirit of Gary Snyder, I am therefore pledging to do (almost) nothing. I am pledging only to break the climate silence. I would like to gather a few people to form a climate support group. A group where we do nothing — on behalf of the planet — except receive and give support for being better people. We will not cook up lists of things to do. We will not brainstorm solutions. We will most certainly be involved in solutions, like planting gardens or closing coal plants or writing to policy makers or biking instead of driving, but we will not take planning those actions as the focus of our gathering. We will instead practice opening our hearts — to each other, to the enormity of the climate problem, to the animals and plants and microorganisms who share our lives and our geography and will also share our fate.

Call it heartstorming instead of brainstorming. We will open our hearts to the reality of climate change. And we will talk. By meeting together about climate change, we will break the climate silence. But we will not talk about solutions so much as provide support to each other for being more open, more truthful, more radically kind. Because, as a wise person said long ago, the truth will set you free. And the truly radical acts will be those that sprout from the compassionate ground of an open heart.

I imagine our meetings might go something like this:

We will gather to laugh and talk and of course share food and drink. When possible, we will meet outdoors to receive inspiration from and soak up the hope that resides in living things. One or two might bring a short piece of inspiration — something that gave hope this week, like a poem, a child’s drawing, a thought, a story of good news, the presence of a nearby tree or flower or rock.

We will share each piece of good news slowly, giving it our full attention and drinking in the juice of hope. Then we will talk about the challenges we face in living more truthfully and kindly in the face of climate change. Together we will break the climate silence. Being truthful about the climate crisis will challenge us to bring our lifestyles into line with reality. How do we do that? How can we help each other be better people in the midst of climate crisis? How do we keep our hearts open?

I envision climate support groups happening in communities across the country — in various neighborhoods of every city. Bill McKibben says that building local community is one of the most crucial things we can do in the face of climate change. As the world changes, we will need the solidarity of relationships, the sweetness of affection and support.

But to build our communities, we’re going to have to talk together. The climate silence is killing us. Literally. I’d like to help break it. How about you?

Priscilla Stuckey received her  Ph.D. from the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, California, in religious studies and feminist theory, and teaches Humanities in the graduate programs at Prescott College. She is a longtime book editor who has worked on hundreds of books on topics of spirituality, religious studies, psychology, and women’s issues. She is presently working on a book titled Kissed by a Fox: And Other Stories of Friendship in Nature. This article originally appeared on her blog, This Lively Earth, and is reprinted here by permission.

1 Comments to “Breaking the Climate Silence”


  1. Once upon a time there were arguments between geologists and climatologists as to whether or not humans were living between,or after, Ice Ages. I say this to underline the fact that the climate of the earth is undergoing change all the time: from hot to cold, dry to wet.
    Many people, however, deny that world climate is getting warmer. Deny global warming. Indeed, it is ironic that every time global warming is hotly debated, many parts of the world experience very cold, if not the coldest, winter with many metres of snow and travel disruption.
    For many people it is essential to distinguish between weather and climate. Local weather can vary greatly from one hour, day, month, season to the next. Global climate is about trends and statistics. There is massive evidence to support the fact that the earth’s biosphere is warmer now than 200 years ago.
    It is well known that the UK, 250 years ago, witnessed the development of the Industrial revolution, and the creation of factories converting wood/coal/gas/oil into energy, products, and pollution. Over the next 200 years, this industrial society has spread across the world. The human population has grown from 1 billion to 6.86 billion and is forecast to be 9 billion by 2050….all busy working, consuming, eating, excreting, polluting. This huge population is actively involved in the exploitation of natural resources, the destruction of the environment, and the pollution of the biosphere.
    It is foolish to deny the facts of climate change. It is foolish to deny the facts of pollution. But the extent to which human activities are responsible for global warming is still a matter for debate.
    Human activities result in the destruction of forests; islands of plastic in the oceans and across the landscape; increasing radioactive particles, as well as more poisonous gases in the atmosphere.
    Human activities may contribute to climate change and global warming by changing the chemical and atomic composition of the atmosphere. Humans are involved in climate change.
    If, individually and collectively, locally and globally, we all changed our behaviour so that we cherished nature, worried about the mass destruction of species, invested in ‘green’ companies, insisted that governments measured and countered pollution, pursued an ecological agenda, matters may improve. We need to recognise that we are responsible for adopting a ‘social ecology’ perspective, which places humans as part of nature, dependent upon each other, and all ecological communities in the biosphere. Climate change will continue.

    go to http://www.kelvynrichards.com A Discourse: Social Ecology

    1

3 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. New Clear Vision (@newclearvision) (@newclearvision) (@newclearvision) 23 03 11
  2. Priscilla Stuckey (@priscillast) 23 03 11
  3. Priscilla Stuckey (@priscillast) (@priscillast) 23 03 11

Leave a Reply